« "That's not a company, that's a feature..." Well, now it's a company... | Main | MySpace and Facebook and the Class Divide »

June 03, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83460007053ef00df351daa108833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Google is Lousy for Reviews:

Comments

Jon

NYTimes ran a story today on just this - Google's freshness rating that helps it decide when to weigh newer content over older content.

Article is called "Inside The Black Box". Interestingly, search for that title on Google and the NYTimes.com result does not come up first.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/03/business/yourmoney/03google.html?ei=5123&en=3feb3068329e344b&ex=1181448000&partner=BREITBART&pagewanted=print

Ari

Funny, I just read that article this morning!

From my experience it is true that Google gives more weight to older pages - the Google search algo. patent for example reveals that Google does take such factors as how long ago a domain name was registered when returning search results.

That being said, I have personally seen 3 to 4 month old sites jump to Page 1 "Above the Fold" listings, just because they have better on-site SEO / Link building efforts than the others competing for its terms. Brothersoft - http://www.brothersoft.com/ - is one "company" which has dominated Google's search results for quite a while due to their aggressive SEO, even though their content is mid-quality at best.

How to seduce a woman

This is a sort of blog we can have loads of information i would like to appreciate the intelligence of this blog's owner

The comments to this entry are closed.